Jail breaking is legal (updated)

It is now clear that jailbreaking your iPhone is legal, at least under the copyright law. Jailbreaking an iPhone is the process of opening up the software to allow the installation of applications other than those available through the official iTunes App Store. The EFF won the decision from the Copyright Office and the Librarian of Congress.  Apple had argued that altering its software on the iPhone was a violation of Apple’s software copyright. It is not. This process is also now legal on other handsets as well.

I don’t think this is actually a very big deal. Jailbreaking iPhones has been easy for some time and most people don’t bother. And it is true that jailbreaking and installing non-approved apps may make the phone less stable.

In any event, before you get too carried away by this new ability, be aware that Apple’s position remains that jailbreaking your iPhone voids it warranty. While it will not be a copyright violation, jailbreaking may be a contractual violation that causes the loss of warranty.

Update: And then there is this from Jon Zittrain, a Harvard Law professor:

The victory for those who want to hack is not trivial even though in large part it is symbolic. I mean here it is in honor of the United States government saying this is actually not illegal behavior, this is OK to jailbreak your phone. Interesting thing though is, the specific provision in title 17 of the US code is 1201 and this is 1201 (a)(1), that says you can’t hack in order to gain access to something protected by copyright. It turns out that there’s another provision that says you’re not allowed to market or traffic in tools whose primary purpose is to let people hack and the exceptions are not permitted to be applied to that provision. So even though the Library of Congress has given blessing to the act of hacking here. It’s not able to give a blessing to trafficking in the tools that let you hack.

Secret America

The Washington Post recently published a fascinating three part series describing the mind-blowing scale of secret intelligence and counter-terrorism operations in the United States in the aftermath of the 9/11 attach.  Did you know that 850,000 Americans have top secret clearance now? The series is fascinating reading. Even looking at a map identifying the number of locations where such activity occurs is stunning.  And the series shows a scandalous level of wasteful spending and secrecy that we should not tolerate by the government in the US.  If the tea-partiers want a target of government action circumscribing liberty, here it is.

A good summary, for those so inclined, is provided in the latest issue of The New Yorker.

  • Some 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies work on programs related to counterterrorism, homeland security and intelligence in about 10,000 locations across the United States.
  • An estimated 854,000 people, nearly 1.5 times as many people as live in Washington, D.C., hold top-secret security clearances.
  • In Washington and the surrounding area, 33 building complexes for top-secret intelligence work are under construction or have been built since September 2001. Together they occupy the equivalent of almost three Pentagons or 22 U.S. Capitol buildings—about 17 million square feet of space.
  • Many security and intelligence agencies do the same work, creating redundancy and waste. For example, 51 federal organizations and military commands, operating in 15 U.S. cities, track the flow of money to and from terrorist networks.
  • Analysts who make sense of documents and conversations obtained by foreign and domestic spying share their judgment by publishing 50,000 intelligence reports each year—a volume so large that many are routinely ignored.
* * *

The story the Post tells is not about criminal conspiracies or rogue elements or corruption in the usual sense. No one’s dedication to the cause of protecting America is questioned. The tale has no villains—unless you count the pathologies of secrecy and bureaucracy and the panicky bravado that led the White House, Congress, and the public to frame the response to Al Qaeda as an essentially unlimited War on Terror. It is an exposé about a secret world, but it exposes no secrets. Interviewees who asked for anonymity did so not in order to “leak”—to reveal classified information—but to express judgments that their bosses and colleagues might hold against them. Virtually all the data that the paper collected in the two years it took to prepare the series was already in the public record.

And this fall, even more on the story will be coming on Frontline on PBS. Here is the preview.

Afghanistan secret files leaked

An apparently huge cache of secret files outlining the errors and failures, including hundreds of innocent civilians killed,  during the war in Afghanistan have been leaked. A huge analysis in multiple articles was published by The Guardian today.  The files were leaked to the Guardian, the New York Times and Der Spiegel by the owner of the website Wikileaks.

The war logs also detail:

  • How a secret “black” unit of special forces hunts down Taliban leaders for “kill or capture” without trial.
  • How the US covered up evidence that the Taliban have acquired deadly surface-to-air missiles.
  • How the coalition is increasingly using deadly Reaper drones to hunt and kill Taliban targets by remote control from a base in Nevada.
  • How the Taliban have caused growing carnage with a massive escalation of its roadside bombing campaign, which has killed more than 2,000 civilians to date.

In a statement, the White House said the chaotic picture painted by the logs was the result of “under-resourcing” under Obama’s predecessor, saying: “It is important to note that the time period reflected in the documents is January 2004 to December 2009.”

The White House also criticised the publication of the files by Wikileaks: “We strongly condemn the disclosure of classified information by individuals and organisations, which puts the lives of the US and partner service members at risk and threatens our national security. Wikileaks made no effort to contact the US government about these documents, which may contain information that endanger the lives of Americans, our partners, and local populations who co-operate with us.”

The logs detail, in sometimes harrowing vignettes, the toll on civilians exacted by coalition forces: events termed “blue on white” in military jargon. The logs reveal 144 such incidents. Some of these casualties come from the controversial air strikes that have led to Afghan government protests in the past, but a large number of previously unknown incidents also appear to be the result of troops shooting unarmed drivers or motorcyclists out of a determination to protect themselves from suicide bombers. At least 195 civilians are admitted to have been killed and 174 wounded in total, although this is likely to be an underestimate because many disputed incidents are omitted from the daily snapshots reported by troops on the ground and then collated, sometimes erratically, by military intelligence analysts.

A compendium of the reports are available at the New York Times.

My immediate reaction is that, while the civilian deaths are regrettable, 2,000 civilians killed in a war that has raged for over 9 years, does not demonstrate a disregard for protecting civilians. Since this war is in the country that was the base for the 9/11 attacks, and the attackers mingled with civilian populations, civilian losses of this magnitude seem to indicate that a lot of care has been shown by coalition troops in minimizing such casualties.

Interesting iPhone numbers

From Mashable:

A survey performed by the Yankee Group found that 73% of iPhone users are “very satisfied” with AT&T, despite all the negative press the cellular network has received since the iPhone launched back in 2007.

Also, 77% of iPhone owners would buy another iPhone, while only 20% of people who use the competing Google Android smartphone platform would repeat their purchases.

Disclosure: I own Apple stock.

Memory etched in granite

Jeffrey Rosen describes a fact of life in the Internet era in a great article from the New York Times Sunday Magazine. He describes the permanence of information (text, photos, videos, tweets, etc) on the Internet and what that does to culture. Everything posted about a person remains virtually forever, and usually accessible by anyone.

The problem she faced is only one example of a challenge that, in big and small ways, is confronting millions of people around the globe: how best to live our lives in a world where the Internet records everything and forgets nothing — where every online photo, status update, Twitter post and blog entry by and about us can be stored forever. With Web sites like LOL Facebook Moments, which collects and shares embarrassing personal revelations from Facebook users, ill-advised photos and online chatter are coming back to haunt people months or years after the fact. Examples are proliferating daily: there was the 16-year-old British girl who was fired from her office job for complaining on Facebook, “I’m so totally bored!!”; there was the 66-year-old Canadian psychotherapist who tried to enter the United States but was turned away at the border — and barred permanently from visiting the country — after a border guard’s Internet search found that the therapist had written an article in a philosophy journal describing his experiments 30 years ago with L.S.D.

According to a recent survey by Microsoft, 75 percent of U.S. recruiters and human-resource professionals report that their companies require them to do online research about candidates, and many use a range of sites when scrutinizing applicants — including search engines, social-networking sites, photo- and video-sharing sites, personal Web sites and blogs, Twitter and online-gaming sites. Seventy percent of U.S. recruiters report that they have rejected candidates because of information found online, like photos and discussion-board conversations and membership in controversial groups.

One of the great historic strengths of America was the ability of people to head west (literally or figuratively) and start life again with a more or less clean slate after making decisions with adverse consequences. Now the smallest error lives forever. This is a major change in the social fabric and one that will have unforeseeable negative effects in the coming decades.

We’ve known for years that the Web allows for unprecedented voyeurism, exhibitionism and inadvertent indiscretion, but we are only beginning to understand the costs of an age in which so much of what we say, and of what others say about us, goes into our permanent — and public — digital files. The fact that the Internet never seems to forget is threatening, at an almost existential level, our ability to control our identities; to preserve the option of reinventing ourselves and starting anew; to overcome our checkered pasts.

In a recent book, “Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age,” the cyberscholar Viktor Mayer-Schönberger cites Stacy Snyder’s case as a reminder of the importance of “societal forgetting.” By “erasing external memories,” he says in the book, “our society accepts that human beings evolve over time, that we have the capacity to learn from past experiences and adjust our behavior.” In traditional societies, where missteps are observed but not necessarily recorded, the limits of human memory ensure that people’s sins are eventually forgotten. By contrast, Mayer-Schönberger notes, a society in which everything is recorded “will forever tether us to all our past actions, making it impossible, in practice, to escape them.” He concludes that “without some form of forgetting, forgiving becomes a difficult undertaking.”

It’s often said that we live in a permissive era, one with infinite second chances. But the truth is that for a great many people, the permanent memory bank of the Web increasingly means there are no second chances — no opportunities to escape a scarlet letter in your digital past. Now the worst thing you’ve done is often the first thing everyone knows about you.

Clever (but disappointing) review of the Droid X (updated)

With all the coverage lately about iPhone 4, some have overlooked the launch of Droid X. But not Tom Socca, who not only reviewed the device, but also wrote the review on it. The results are not pretty, but worth a full read.

I tried to write the title of this Using the voice recognition on the Deoid X but it didn,’t go very well. I tries the voice recognition. Wcause because the virtual keyboard ia pretty a.nohing annoying too.

I had written that last bit once before.., half an hour ago., but then the Droid x crashed, all at once: annoying keypad interface replaced by blank glossy black slab. Totally inert. I had to yank the battery.

Then it turned out that when I got the phone., the thing I thought was a throwaway film blocking the. Artery. Battery was supposed to stay there, because without the floppy yellow throwaway tab., there’s no good way to pry out the battery. Every$ 200 machine should depend on a thick piece of scotch tape. I guess the iPhone needs duct tape to protect the
Antwnn antenna, so that’s a wash.

ProbBly there was some fine print on the pullout telling me not to remove it, but I am an Old and my eyes are bad. All I saw was “PULL.” Or it could be that the whole thimg about not removing the plastic was an Internet hoax. I am an Old.

Update: And now Apple has posted the following video showing a “death grip” issue with the Droid X.

The archeology of icons

Software icons have a longer history than you probably know. This article provides a fascinating look at the development and art of icons, past and present. How far back can you trace your interaction with the ubiquitous little software hotspots you use everyday? My first experience was with the original Macintosh in 1984.

Look how crude the Windows 3.0 icons appear by today’s standards. Of course, Windows icons actually remain a bit crude through today.

First killer app for the iPad?

As with any platform, the iPad creates a new experience for users and opportunities for creative developers to create entirely new and compelling applications. While several apps for the iPad have been extremely popular (like the ABC player app and the terrific Netflix streaming app), in my view the first true “killer app” for the iPad is likely to be Flipboard.

Flipboard (iTunes link, free) provides a magazine like reading experience pulling in content from user selected subject matter groupings. It also allows users to enter their Facebook and Twitter account information and Flipboard then pulls the content and displays it in an easy-t0-read format. With Twitter feeds, for example, the app not only pulls in the feed, but also if a tweet includes a link to a photo or website or video, that linked content is automatically displayed. Very sweet.

Be advised that there is a crush of users trying to activate Flipboard now. The company has posted information here. In addition, some question whether Flipboard can legally pull and display the content from other websites.

Excess bonuses found by pay czar

This is hardly a surprise, but Federal government has determined that huge and excessive bonuses were paid on Wall Street leading up to the economic collapse that continues the hurt the average American today. The bailout of these banks was a gigantic transfer of wealth from main street to Wall Street, and virtually a form of theft.

In a report to be released on Friday, Kenneth R. Feinberg, the Obama administration’s special master for executive compensation, is expected to name 17 financial companies that made questionable payouts totaling $1.58 billion immediately after accepting billions of dollars of taxpayer aid, according to two government officials with knowledge of his findings who requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the report.

The group includes Wall Street giants like Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase and the American International Group as well as small lenders like Boston Private Financial Holdings. Mr. Feinberg’s report points to companies that he says paid eye-popping amounts or used haphazard criteria for awarding bonuses, the people with knowledge of his findings said, and he has singled out Citigroup as the biggest offender.

Tech quote of the day

If it turns out that the iPad cannibalizes PCs, then I think it is fantastic for us because there are a lot of PCs to cannibalize.

– Apple COO Tim Cook, during yesterday’s earnings call announcing another blow-out quarter for the company.  The iPad is not cannibalizing Macs; sales of Apple computers were up 33% year-over-year for the quarter.

Disclosure: I own Apple stock.