Yesterday, at a meeting of the House Judiciary Committee, several members of the committee, of both parties, criticized the operation of the leaked NSA programs. You can watch the full hearing below (requires Flash), and get other details from this article in the New York Times or the articles below. I have watched the entire hearing and it seems clear to me that a majority of the committee was at least highly skeptical of the meta-data collection from Americans or outright hostile to the program. Excellent news.
And there is this from The Atlantic Wire:
As an aside during testimony on Capitol Hill today, a National Security Agency representative rather casually indicated that the government looks at data from a universe of far, far more people than previously indicated.
Chris Inglis, the agency’s deputy director, was one of several government representatives—including from the FBI and the office of the Director of National Intelligence—testifying before the House Judiciary Committee this morning. Most of the testimony largely echoed previous testimonyby the agencies on the topic of the government’s surveillance, including a retread of the same offered examples for how the Patriot Act and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act had stopped terror events.
But Inglis’ statement was new. Analysts look “two or three hops” from terror suspects when evaluating terror activity, Inglis revealed. Previously, the limit of how surveillance was extended had been described as two hops. This meant that if the NSA were following a phone metadata or web trail from a terror suspect, it could also look at the calls from the people that suspect has spoken with—one hop. And then, the calls that second person had also spoken with—two hops. Terror suspect to person two to person three. Two hops. And now: A third hop.
Think of it this way. Let’s say the government suspects you are a terrorist and it has access to your Facebook account. If you’re an American citizen, it can’t do that currently (with certain exceptions)—but for the sake of argument. So all of your friends, that’s one hop. Your friends’ friends, whether you know them or not—two hops. Your friends’ friends’ friends, whoever they happen to be, are that third hop. That’s a massive group of people that the NSA apparently considers fair game.
- House Judiciary Committee Pushes Obama Administration Officials On Surveillance Overreach (techpresident.com)
- NSA spying under fire: ‘You’ve got a problem’ (sfgate.com)
- Congressmen Brutalize NSA in Judiciary Hearing (breitbart.com)
- NSA warned to rein in surveillance as agency reveals even greater scope (guardian.co.uk)
- NSA Official Admits Agency’s Surveillance Covers Even More People Than Previously Indicated (techdirt.com)
- House GOP, Dem. lawmakers angry about NSA domestic spying (upi.com)