Buddhism quote of the day

Tenzin Gyatso, the fourteenth and current Dala...

Tenzin Gyatso, the fourteenth and current Dalai Lama. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

It is quite strange – as non-believers, totally non-believers, atheists – showing interest about reincarnation. I jokingly tell them: In order to be involved in my reincarnation, firstly, they should accept Buddhism. Or religion. Or Buddhism. Then they should recognize Chairman Mao Zedong’s reincarnation. Deng Xiaopeng’s reincarnation. Then, they have reason to show some interest about the Dalai Lama’s reincarnation. Otherwise, nonsense!

–  the14th Dalai Lama, Tenzin Gyatso, noting the folly of the Chinese government’s claim that it will identify his reincarnation. (via Boing Boing)

Political quote of the day

As president, Reagan worked very well with Democrats to do big things. It is true that he worked to reduce the size of government and cut federal taxes and he eliminated many regulations, but he also raised taxes when necessary. In 1983, he doubled the gas tax to pay for highway infrastructure improvements.

Today, that would be enough for some of the ideological enforcers to start looking for a “real” conservative to challenge him in a primary.

Some Republicans today aren’t even willing to have conversations about protecting the environment, investing in the infrastructure America needs or improving healthcare. By holding their fingers in their ears when those topics arise, these Republicans aren’t just denying themselves a seat at the table; in a state such as California, they also deny a seat to every other Republican.

Arnold Schwarzenegger

Quote of the day

For crying out loud, even Batman drove his own car.

Charlie Angus, ethics critic for the Official Opposition, during question period in the Canadian House of Commons on May 2. Angus was complaining about the large expenditures made by the government on overtime for the drivers of cabinet ministers.

(via Quotation of the Day Mailing List)

FBI wants wiretap backdoors to Internet

Declan McCullagh, writing in CNET:

The FBI is asking Internet companies not to oppose a controversial proposal that would require the firms, including Microsoft, Facebook, Yahoo, and Google, to build in backdoors for government surveillance.

In meetings with industry representatives, the White House, and U.S. senators, senior FBI officials argue the dramatic shift in communication from the telephone system to the Internet has made it far more difficult for agents to wiretap Americans suspected of illegal activities, CNET has learned.

The FBI general counsel’s office has drafted a proposed law that the bureau claims is the best solution: requiring that social-networking Web sites and providers of VoIP, instant messaging, and Web e-mail alter their code to ensure their products are wiretap-friendly.

It is time, once again, for the Internet community to man the barricades and push back on a further erosion of privacy rights in this country.

Guns and politics

Here is an interesting data point from ABC News:

In the politically-charged and likely protest-filled streets of Tampa, Fla., during the Republican National Convention in August, water guns will be strictly prohibited. Concealed handguns, on the other hand, will be perfectly legal.

Florida Gov. Rick Scott said this week that banning handguns from downtown Tampa during the convention, as the city’s Mayor Bob Buckhorn requested, “would surely violate the Second Amendment.”

More here.

Political quote of the day

Mitt Romney has been forced to say, ‘Look, I overstepped my bounds here. I went outside the parameters here. I went off the reservation with this hire. The pro-family community has called me back to the table here. Called me back inside the borders of the reservation.’

Bryan Fischer, of the American Family Association, bragging about the departure from the Romney campaign of an openly gay conservative foreign policy adviser, Richard Grennell. I guess that Mitt’s Etch-a-Sketch must be broken.

Haters will hate (and some will shoot)

In North Carolina, voters will be presented with a state constitutional amendment titled “Amendment One.”  If approved, it will define marriage in the state constitution as between one man and one woman, and would ban any other type of “domestic legal union” such as civil unions and domestic partnerships.

Now a man has filmed himself firing a shotgun into a neighbor’s yard sign advocating that Amendment One be turned down.

More here.

I have spoken to the Kannopolis, North Carolina police department and they are looking into what will be classified a crime if the shotgun was fired onto property that includes a home or business. Kannopolis is 20 minutes outside of Charlotte, so let’s also get this on the radar of local media.

The NYT on Apple

Today, the New York Times runs another article attacking Apple as part of the Times so-called “iEconomy” series. This piece focuses on on Apple’s international tax planning and minimization. Once again, the New York Times attacks Apple despite the fact that many, many other corporations do the same thing.  And, of course, the bulk of taxes paid with respect to Apple income is actually paid by its shareholders.

Apple’s response is here.

The New York Times itself describes its iEconomy series as examining the “challenges posed by increasingly globalized high-tech industries.” So why the continuing focus on one company in one high tech industry?

By the way, providing that Apple’s tax planning techniques are legal (and even the Times seems to confirm that), Apple is doing the right thing for its shareholders.

Perhaps the New York Times should turn a portion of its investigative talents on itself for a change. Its market capitalization is currently a little under $938 Million. Five years ago, in June, 2007, its market capitalization was $3.6 Billion.  So, over the past five years, the New York Times has lost approximately three quarters of its shareholder value.  And when its Chief Executive Janet Robinson left the company at the end of 2011, guess what compensation she received for her work leading the company to falling profits? $24 Million.  Great job, Times management.

Disclosure: I am long AAPL.

What do you know about CISPA?

CISPA, the Computer Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, passed the House with a large majority yesterday. Unfortunately, because of an amendment adopted just before passage of the bill, CISPA essentially eliminates all fourth amendment protections on the Internet. The online world becomes totally open to surveillance, notwithstanding any other law.

…CISPA allowed the government to use information for “cybersecurity” or “national security” purposes. Those purposes have not been limited or removed. Instead, three more valid uses have been added: investigation and prosecution of cybersecurity crime, protection of individuals, and protection of children. Cybersecurity crime is defined as any crime involving network disruption or hacking, plus any violation of the CFAA.

Basically this means CISPA can no longer be called a cybersecurity bill at all. The government would be able to search information it collects under CISPA for the purposes of investigating American citizens with complete immunity from all privacy protections as long as they can claim someone committed a “cybersecurity crime”. Basically it says the 4th Amendment does not apply online, at all. Moreover, the government could do whatever it wants with the data as long as it can claim that someone was in danger of bodily harm, or that children were somehow threatened—again, notwithstanding absolutely any other law that would normally limit the government’s power.

The President has threatened to veto CISPA in its present form if it gets to his desk, but who knows if he will follow through.

A terrific FAQ on the potential impact is available here.

The latest TSA “terrorist”

The latest victim of TSA abuse is a 7 year old girl with cerebral palsy and developmental disabilities.  After reviewing the situation, the TSA declared that nothing was done inappropriately.

“TSA has reviewed the incident and determined that our officers followed proper screening procedures in conducting a modified pat-down on the child,” the agency said.

So much for “TSA Cares.”

Four year old terrorized by TSA

The TSA is at it again.

“When my Four-year-old daughter noticed her Grandmother, she excitedly ran over to give her a hug, as children often do,” Michelle Brademeyer wrote in a lengthy Facebook post detailing the ordeal. “They made very brief contact, no longer than a few seconds. The Transportation Security Officers(TSO) who were present responded to this very simple action in the worst way imaginable.”

According to Brademeyer, a TSO “began yelling” at Izzy and ordered her to wait for a pat-down. She was prevented from approaching her mother, and told to “come to them, alone, and spread her arms and legs.” Frightened, Izzy screamed “I don’t want to” and bolted. She was returned to the security area, but not before a TSO threatened to shut down the airport and cancel all flights if Izzy was not restrained.

And check out this one.