Tech quote of the day

You lie awake at night worrying about what is that which will disrupt your business model. Apple iMessage is a classic example. If you’re using iMessage, you’re not using one of our messaging services, right? That’s disruptive to our messaging revenue stream.

– AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson, regretting that the telco carriers’ massively over-priced text messaging plans are under serious assault.

I think this Tweet expresses my view quite ably:

FBI wants wiretap backdoors to Internet

Declan McCullagh, writing in CNET:

The FBI is asking Internet companies not to oppose a controversial proposal that would require the firms, including Microsoft, Facebook, Yahoo, and Google, to build in backdoors for government surveillance.

In meetings with industry representatives, the White House, and U.S. senators, senior FBI officials argue the dramatic shift in communication from the telephone system to the Internet has made it far more difficult for agents to wiretap Americans suspected of illegal activities, CNET has learned.

The FBI general counsel’s office has drafted a proposed law that the bureau claims is the best solution: requiring that social-networking Web sites and providers of VoIP, instant messaging, and Web e-mail alter their code to ensure their products are wiretap-friendly.

It is time, once again, for the Internet community to man the barricades and push back on a further erosion of privacy rights in this country.

Android is winning

From Business Week:

Apple Inc.’s iPad widened its lead in the tablet market to 68 percent in the first quarter, while most devices running Google Inc.’s Android software saw sales slump, according to IDC.

Apple’s market share climbed from 55 percent in the previous three months, the Framingham, Massachusetts-based research firm said. Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) (AMZN)’s Kindle Fire, which runs on Android, saw its share tumble to about 4 percent, from 17 percent in the previous quarter.

Yup, Android is winning.

Guns and politics

Here is an interesting data point from ABC News:

In the politically-charged and likely protest-filled streets of Tampa, Fla., during the Republican National Convention in August, water guns will be strictly prohibited. Concealed handguns, on the other hand, will be perfectly legal.

Florida Gov. Rick Scott said this week that banning handguns from downtown Tampa during the convention, as the city’s Mayor Bob Buckhorn requested, “would surely violate the Second Amendment.”

More here.

Political quote of the day

Mitt Romney has been forced to say, ‘Look, I overstepped my bounds here. I went outside the parameters here. I went off the reservation with this hire. The pro-family community has called me back to the table here. Called me back inside the borders of the reservation.’

Bryan Fischer, of the American Family Association, bragging about the departure from the Romney campaign of an openly gay conservative foreign policy adviser, Richard Grennell. I guess that Mitt’s Etch-a-Sketch must be broken.

How the iPhone helps the blind

There is a fascinating article in The Atlantic, written by Liat Kornowski, describing how the iPhone has become a boon for the blind, despite its lack of a physical keyboard. The accessibility features built in are a big part of the effectiveness for the blind, but so are apps designed for the blind by the blind.

For the visually impaired community, the introduction of the iPhone in 2007 seemed at first like a disaster — the standard-bearer of a new generation of smartphones was based on touch screens that had no physical differentiation. It was a flat piece of glass. But soon enough, word started to spread: The iPhone came with a built-in accessibility feature. Still, members of the community were hesitant.

But no more. For its fans and advocates in the visually-impaired community, the iPhone has turned out to be one of the most revolutionary developments since the invention of Braille. That the iPhone and its world of apps have transformed the lives of its visually impaired users may seem counter-intuitive — but their impact is striking.

Apple has also built deep accessibility functionality into OS X.

Phone manufacturer profitability

According to Horace Deidu, here are the phone industry profits for Q1 2012:

Meanwhile, RIM pushed out a crippled developer preview of its new phones, and the stock plunged.

Disclosure: I am long AAPL.

Haters will hate (and some will shoot)

In North Carolina, voters will be presented with a state constitutional amendment titled “Amendment One.”  If approved, it will define marriage in the state constitution as between one man and one woman, and would ban any other type of “domestic legal union” such as civil unions and domestic partnerships.

Now a man has filmed himself firing a shotgun into a neighbor’s yard sign advocating that Amendment One be turned down.

More here.

I have spoken to the Kannopolis, North Carolina police department and they are looking into what will be classified a crime if the shotgun was fired onto property that includes a home or business. Kannopolis is 20 minutes outside of Charlotte, so let’s also get this on the radar of local media.

What the New York Times missed

Arik Hesseldahl, writing in All Things D, points out that the New York Times story about Apple and its tax payments was misleading in certain respects.

…the implication the story leaves you with — that Apple is somehow doing society a disservice by not paying its fair share of corporate taxes — is simply wrong on many levels. The most dubious of lines that the Times attempts to draw is between Apple and the budget crisis at De Anza College, a local community college where Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak was once a student. The college is facing a “death spiral” because of a decline in funding from the state. This funding, the reader is led to conclude, would be more plentiful if corporations like Apple were to step up and pay and not escape the tax bill by setting up an office in neighboring Nevada.

What the Times fails to make clear is how community colleges are funded in California. The picture is much more complicated. California community colleges draw the majority of their funding from the state’s general fund — which is drawn directly from the state’s personal and corporate income taxes — and from local property taxes collected by counties. As of the 2009-2010 budget cycle, these two buckets made up about 88 percent of the system’s funding. State lottery funds, federal funds and student fees made up the remainder.