Is your smartphone secure?

Probably not, if you have an Android phone.

According to malware researchers at F-Secure Labs, the number of active mobile threat families and variants initially spiked in the winter quarter, with Android’s share jumping from 49 out of 74 known threats to 96 out of 100, with the balance being related to Nokia’s essentially mothballed Symbian platform.

That was enough to rouse a tweet from the rarely used account of Apple’s head of worldwide marketing Phil Schiller, who linked to the report with the brief admonition “be safe out there.”

However, F-Secure’s new report for the latest quarter shows Android now accounts for 136 out of 149 known threats, or 91.3 percent of all malware activity (up from 79 percent in 2012).

The other threats remained related to Symbian, with zero discovered for Blackberry, Microsoft’s Windows Mobile/Phone or Apple’s iOS. The research noted that mobile threats are overwhelmingly motivated by profits, with 76.5 percent designed specifically to con users out of money, rather than seeking to just cause damage.

(via Apple Insider)

Who is winning: iOS or Android?

Harry McCracken reviews the current numbers for iOS and Android in some detail in order to determine which is “winning.” He concludes that it depends on your definition of “winning.” More Android devices are sold worldwide that iOS devices. But Apple’s iOS earns more profits that all Android devices combined. He correctly notes that this is very different from the historic PC markets where profits followed volume.

In my view, from a business perspective, profits are more important than unit sales.

Facebook Home commercial

Here is the first commercial released by Facebook concerning their Facebook Home app on Android. To me, the product looks annoying. I wouldn’t want unknown photos popping up on my device automatically as it does. Further, if you watch the screens in the ad, you will see that their are no battery status indicators show, nor any indication of network strength. Nor is there a persistent clock. Seems crazy to me. I also wonder whether Google will take actions to limit the availability of such apps on Android.

Apple iOS is gaining on Android in US

comScore’s latest US survey via All Things D:

For the three-month period ended in February, the iPhone was the most popular smartphone in the U.S., with a 38.9 percent market share — up 3.9 percentage points from the November quarter. And with a 38.9 percent share, iOS was the second-most-popular smartphone platform, also up 3.9 percentage points from the preceding period.

Here are the numbers based on platform (i.e., operating system):

Comscore_smartphone_platform

And here are the numbers based on manufacturer:

Comscore_smartphone_hardware

This numbers certainly do not show that Apple is a troubled smartphone manufacturer, at least in the US.

The five most popular mobile devices in the enterprise

According to Good Technology, the five most popular mobile device activated in the enterprise in the 4th quarter of 2012 were the following:

1. iPhone 5 (32% of total Q4 mobile device activations)

2. iPhone 4S (20%)

3. iPhone 4 (14%)

4. iPad 3 (11.7%)

5. iPad 2 (7.7%)

In total, Apple devices accounted for 77% of the enterprise activations, up from 70% in 2011. Android activations were down 7% from 2011.

Amazing.

Disclosure: I am long AAPL.

Tech quote of the day

I just don’t see the tons of crazy new ideas that I did a few years ago. Things that are genuinely new and interesting.

Yeah, yeah, mobile. I get it. Everything’s mobile these days. LET’S GO MO-BILE! But really that’s just an IQ test. When you see bold new startups with nothing but a desktop strategy, you know they just don’t get it and you move on.

But really a lot of the mobile stuff out there is just radioactive decay from the iPhone launching in 2007.

2007!

Old news! Ancient platforms!

Yeah, the iPhone and Android are great. But seriously, look at the top headline grabbers in tech news in 2012. Apple. Google. Facebook. Microsoft. Christ. It might as well still be 2007.

Michael Arrington. I have to agree that the launch of the iPhone in 2007 was the last super-meaningful technology change since then.

Happy New Year.

Tech quote of the day

Via Daring Fireball:

Having put it through the paces we subject each portable navigator to in our test program, our original criticisms remain. But having more thoroughly tested Apple Maps alongside a Samsung Galaxy S3 running Android 4.0.4 (Ice Cream Sandwich) with Google Maps, we have a more favorable opinion — certainly more favorable than comments and articles that we’ve been reading online.

Consumer Reports, a company not known for giving Apple the benefit of the doubt.

Amazon Kindle Fire HD review round-up

Amazon’s new Kindle 7-inch tablet is out and the reviewers are posting their views. It is not all sweetness and light.

David Pogue, NYT:

There is also, alas, a lot of soot.

For example, Amazon trumpets the Fire’s dual Wi-Fi antennas — a first in a tablet — which is supposed to give you a better, faster Internet signal.

Well, fine, but the Fire still lags the iPad in Web browsing. It took my Fire one second longer than the iPad to pull up nytimes.com or ESPN.com (7 seconds versus 6), four seconds longer for People.com, three seconds longer for Cracked.com — and, amusingly, 1.5 seconds longer to pull up Amazon.com.

There’s a camera on the front, but no camera app to use with it. Until someone writes software for it, you can’t take a picture or record video. Amazon says that for now, it’s for use only with Skype for video calling.

Most urgently of all, Amazon should tackle the apps problem. The Fire still lacks built-in apps for navigation, notes, to-do lists, alarm clock or stopwatch.

Amazon says more than 30,000 apps are available for the Fire, but they include only a fraction of my iPad favorites. For example, I couldn’t find Dropbox, Bump, Flixster, Echofon, Voxer, Flight Track Pro, Nest, Jot Not, Google Voice, Google Search or Taxi Magic.

Finally, there are the bugs. Once again, Amazon seems to have scrambled for the holidays, with the intention of polishing its software later.

Everything lags a bit; some apps take 7 or 8 seconds to open. The Gmail sign-up wizard has bugs; Draw Something’s screen appears upside-down, and won’t rotate upright; and turning a magazine page or zooming in produces blurry, blotchy text. It takes the gasping processor a couple of seconds to catch up with the sharp text you’re expecting.

Walt Mossberg, WSJ:

So, while Amazon is still stressing that these new Fires are best seen as front doors to its online stores, it is now claiming the Fire HD is also “the best tablet at any price.”

* * *

However, after testing the 7-inch Kindle Fire HD, I can’t agree with the sweeping claim that it is “the best tablet at any price.”

The Fire HD isn’t as polished, fluid or versatile as the iPad. It offers only a fraction of the third-party apps available on either the iPad or the Nexus 7 (and other standard Android tablets). I found that after prolonged use, the Fire HD showed signs of latency—apps and content displayed delays in launching. This latency disappeared after a reboot.

The Fire HD also assaults users with ads occupying the entire screen every time they start or resume using it. You have to pay Amazon another $15, using an obscure setting on a Web page, to escape these ads. And there are pitches to buy more content on many other screens, even those displaying your already-purchased content.

* * *

The Fire is really a hardware entry point to Amazon’s massive, unmatched selection of books and other content. Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos introduced the Fire HD saying it shouldn’t be thought of as a gadget. “The Kindle Fire is a service,” he said.

* * *

Overall, I see the 7-inch Fire HD as a good value for those primarily interested in easily tapping Amazon’s large collection of content.

Joshua Topolsky, The Verge:

There are two devices in this review. The first is something like an appliance — a window through which you casually view content, a way to listen to music, an e-reader for the train ride home. On that device, things like a big app selection or elaborate user experience take a back seat to content selection, price point, and simplicity. On that device, it’s not about going toe-to-toe with the competition in every way (as Amazon seems to want to do), it’s about offering a lot of fun stuff to consumers, and getting them to consume more. As that device, the Fire HD is a complete success. A marvel of bottom-line engineering and incredibly clever subsidies. It’s a really, really good tablet for doing some very specific things.

But there’s a second tablet in the review as well. One that gets compared to the iPad and Nexus 7. One that I expect to do more than just show me movies or help me shop. One that should be a companion for all kinds of things I want to do, that doesn’t feel limited, that doesn’t respond to my touches slowly, that doesn’t make me wait.

As that device, the Fire HD still has a long way to go. I think it can get there, but it isn’t there yet.

Tim Stevens, Engadget:

Even if you step up and pay the extra $15 to disable Offers on your Kindle Fire HD, you can never and will never shake the feeling that this is less a tablet and more of a tool for shopping — a Trojan Horse that’s let into your home thanks to its low price and then unleashes a legion of must-buy items to completely compromise any walls you’ve built around your budget.

If you can get past that decidedly subsidized feeling, you do have a compelling package in your hands. The HD is fast, has a nice design, a beautiful screen, proper stereo speakers and, of course, oodles and oodles of premium content. For casual users looking for an inexpensive yet powerful tablet, the Kindle Fire HD should absolutely be at the top of your shopping list. But, for those looking to do more, and do more rapidly, the Nexus 7 is still the king of this diminutive hill.

Disclosure: I am long AAPL.

Tech quote of the day

Apple is at the start of a truly “thermonuclear war” on Google. It’s clearer than ever that Apple really is going to attempt to kill Google. And we’re not just talking about Android. Apple is going to try to blow up all of Google.

Google, for all of its ancillary businesses, lives and dies with search. Apple is doing everything it can with iOS to de-emphasize the importance of search, and the web, in its mobile devices.

Jay Yarrow

Tech quote of the day

Peter Kafka: You’ve complained publicly before about the difficulty in supporting multiple flavors of Android for your apps. But this year you’ve expanded the number of Android handsets you’re supporting from 6 to 11. Did you ever consider not working with Android at all?

Bob Bowman: The short answer is no. But what we have done is that we don’t support every Android phone. Because at some point, it’s diminishing returns. The Android user typically is less likely to buy, and therefore the ROI on developing for Android is different than it is for Apple.

Peter Kafka: Why do you think an Android owner behaves differently than an iPhone owner?

Bob Bowman: The iPhone and iPad user is interested in buying content–that’s one of the reasons they bought the device. The Android buyer is different.

It’s a great phone–make no mistake about it. But if you really want first rate digital content on a device, your first look will probably be an iPhone. And on the tablet, an iPad.

Bob Bowman runs Major League Baseball Advanced Media, including MLB.com and its subscription services.

Android is winning

From Business Week:

Apple Inc.’s iPad widened its lead in the tablet market to 68 percent in the first quarter, while most devices running Google Inc.’s Android software saw sales slump, according to IDC.

Apple’s market share climbed from 55 percent in the previous three months, the Framingham, Massachusetts-based research firm said. Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) (AMZN)’s Kindle Fire, which runs on Android, saw its share tumble to about 4 percent, from 17 percent in the previous quarter.

Yup, Android is winning.

Phone manufacturer profitability

According to Horace Deidu, here are the phone industry profits for Q1 2012:

Meanwhile, RIM pushed out a crippled developer preview of its new phones, and the stock plunged.

Disclosure: I am long AAPL.