Nielsen: iPhone 4S generates “enormous impact”

According to a recent report from Nielsen, Apple’s launch of the iPhone 4S last fall has had an “enormous impact” on the smartphone market. Among other things, Apple’s share of recent smartphone purchases has increased tremendously each month in the fourth quarter of 2011, putting it within range of all the Android phones combined.

So, what about the “pundits” who claimed dissatisfaction with the iPhone 4S at launch? What about all the cries that it was “only” a 4S and not the much-rumored iPhone 5? The fact of the matter is that the iPhone 4S is the iPhone 5. The 4S is most certainly not a fall-back product created to disguise the lack of the iPhone 5. It is in fact the single best smartphone on the market and it is the largest selling smartphone model in the world.

By the way, the second largest selling smartphone in the world is the iPhone 4 and the third largest selling smartphone in the world is the iPhone 3GS.

And it may, or may not, be a coincidence, but Apple stock hit an all-time high today and is up further in after-hours trading.

Disclosure: I am long AAPL.

A history of computing platforms

Take a look at this video from Horace Deidu. It shows the number of units of various platforms shipped over time. It clearly shows the disruption caused by Apple and in particular its iOS devices.

The video is accompanied by a detailed article with charts that you can view here.

Disclosure: I am long AAPL.

Apple makes computers too

There is no doubt that iOS devices currently generate the bulk of Apple’s revenues and profits. As recently as one year ago, iOS-based products generated over 70% of Apple’s profits, and that share is almost certainly greatly increased by now.

But the overwhelming profits generated by iOS often seem to give rise to an impression that Apple’s computer sales are not significant.  This is not true.

According to Gartner, for the fourth quarter of calendar year 2011, while PC sales in the US fell 5.9%, Apple’s US personal computer sales were up 20% and making Apple the third largest seller of computers in the US, behind HP and Dell.

Here are Gartner’s numbers for the fourth quarter 2011:

Disclosure: I am long AAPL.

Tech quote of the day

The Apple assault on the corporate market has so far taken place without much formal Apple support, and probably without Apple itself understanding its full extent. That’s because corporate adoption of Apple products has been largely clandestine.

– Forrester’s latest Global Tech Market Outlook, noting that, without Apple’s conscious intervention, employees are demanding Apple products in such numbers that Apple will sell $10 billion worth of iPads and $9 billion of Macs to business customers in 2012.

This reminds me of the early days of PC “infiltration” of the corporate workspace. I am old enough to have lived through the onslaught of the PC into the corporate world in the early to mid 80s. PCs came into the workspace with no formal or informal blessing on the part of most firms’ management. Someone saw Visicalc or Lotus 1-2-3 and  immediately understood the benefits that would inure to themselves. (I convinced an employer to purchase a first generation IBM PC for me in 1983 and I later brought my own computer (a Compaq portable) into work in 1984.) And in very short order, these employee-owned, one-off acquisitions of computers took over. Businesses eventually followed.

Back then, many employees simply purchased their own personal computers and brought them to work. It was, in part, an effort to grab computing power from the big-iron computing centers of employers and it directly benefited both the employees and the employers.

When a radical change, like the one from the 80s, is in process, employees are better able to both grasp the value of the change and to implement the change than is the normal bureaucratic time frame of business. Most organizations are (or have been) simply too slow to move with the speed of a smart and empowered employee with sufficient disposable income to create their own technology infrastructure.

Now it is Apple’s turn to benefit from this pattern.

Disclosure: I am long APPL.

Android is dead man walking

And that is not (merely) my opinion.  It is the view of Antonio Rodriguez:

More specifically, three events in 2011 burned it [Android success] and we’re now holding on to a charred corpse that is quite different: an Android so splintered that it will make the glass on your Galaxy Nexus S2 Prime Pie dropped on concrete look like an ice skating rink.

The three events: 1. Google buying Motorola and alienating all of the tier one handset makers (none of which to this day have the spine to state it publicly but all of which have now come up with their “plan B”), 2. Microsoft extracting licensing fees from these same handset makers in the form of IP indemnification and 3. Amazon shipping a wildly successful, yet unidentifiable, version of an old Android build over the holiday… and making it a wild success. Of the the three, #1 was completely avoidable but the other two may just have been the name of the game when there is so much at stake in the fight of who paints the interface for the next generation of computing.

It not a particularly well-kept secret that when WebOS was in its death spiral, HP would happily pay developers to port any application which had shown traction to their platform. To my knowledge the Android tier one handset guys have not done this yet, but given a little time it may become a reality. There will still be all sorts of headaches involved, and you might be better off taking the love from Microsoft, but in a world of several warring Androids, you are the scarce commodity. Though the more popular splinters such as Amazon’s will likely never have to pay for developers, especially given the fact that with only one Christmas under their belt, they are already outperforming the standard Google Market in terms of downloads for some app categories, the rest will, probably in inverse proportion to how valuable they will be to getting you users. And in the meanwhile consider them non-dilutive equity financing sources.

Read the entire piece. Not good news for Android, but he promises another post on iOS which is said to provide warnings for that side as well.

I think he is onto something with a very clear explication that goes beyond the typical “Android as a platform is splintered” claims that many make.

And there is this:

The iPhone 4S, along with cheaper older models, has helped Apple close the distance on Google’s Android, drawing within a few percentage points in recent smartphone sales market share in the U.S., according to the NPD Group. In a CES telecom fact sheet, the research firm said that iOS has zoomed up to 43 percent of sales in October and November, compared with 26 percent in the third quarter. Meanwhile, Android’s share dropped from a high of 60 percent in the third quarter to 47 percent in October and November.

By the way, the same NPD survey said the top three phone models were the iPhone 4S, the iPhone 4 and the iPhone 3GS.

Whatever you think about the above, one thing is clear: RIM is not the walking dead. It is the inert, immobile, and truly dead.

There are exciting, nail-biting day ahead for investors, my friends.

Disclosure: I am long APPL.

Macworld’s Apple predictions for 2012

Macworld has published a compendium of predictions about Apple’s 2012 actions written by a great cross-section of Apple pundits. Most take a serious approach and are worth a careful read.  But my favorite is this one:

John Moltz, editor in chief, Crazy Apple Rumors
Last year’s score: Mac OS X, 1.0; iOS, 0; hardware, 0; pie, 0.5. Total = 1.5/4.0

Mac OS X: Tired of languishing in iOS’s shadow, Mac OS X will rebel by getting a tattoo against Tim Cook’s expressed wishes—possibly a tribal arm band or a something edgy to show its own OS, like THUG LIFE. A furious Cook will threaten to revoke OS X’s car privileges and the whole thing will blow up at WWDC where OS X will storm off the stage, leaving Cook standing there with iOS (which the Mac OS will claim is his favorite anyway so what difference does it make? God, NO ONE UNDERSTANDS ME!).

iOS: Having given iOS a major upgrade to its notification system in 2011, Apple will implement an even more startling upgrade in 2012: pre-notifications. Using patented time-displacement technology, Apple will deliver pre-notifications for events that will be happening to you shortly, such as “Your brother will call you in 15 minutes”, “The milk in your refrigerator will go bad at 3:15 PM” and “Hear that clock tower chiming midnight? You’ll be dead by the time the bells stop. Make peace with whatever god(s) you worship”. Google will attempt to copy the feature by using the open-source “Magic 8-Ball” system.

Hardware: Sexbots. I’ve long said that only Apple can deliver the kind of product quality and smooth user experience that will make this currently niche product category really take off, and I believe 2012 will be the year Apple makes it happen. (Well, belief and hope are often so mixed up that it’s hard to tell them apart. But why not 2013? Seriously, why not, Apple? Because if there’s some barrier you need our help overcoming, we’re all ears.)

Pie-in-the-sky wish: That’s it exactly. Pie…in the sky. Apple will launch a series of satellites to create an orbital pie-delivery system, eradicating world hunger by delivering fruit-filled goodness anywhere in the world. This will also set the company up for 2013 when it will deliver a shiny aluminum solution for obesity.

Life and death of the TouchPad

English: Jon Rubenstein introduces new HP Touc...

Jon Rubinstein announces the HP TouchPad in February 2007

HP paid $1.2 billion to purchase Palm to get its WebOS operating system designed for handheld devices. HP then launched the TouchPad tablet running WebOS. But after less than seven weeks on the market, HP killed the TouchPad, and open-sourced WebOS.

The New York Times offers some explanations for this expensive failure.

WebOS turned out to be something of a toxic asset. Several former Palm and H.P. employees involved in WebOS say that there was little hope for the software from the beginning, because the way it was built was so deeply flawed.

“Palm was ahead of its time in trying to build a phone software platform using Web technology, and we just weren’t able to execute such an ambitious and breakthrough design,” said Paul Mercer, former senior director of software at Palm, who oversaw the interface design of WebOS and recruited crucial members of the team. “Perhaps it never could have been executed because the technology wasn’t there yet.”

Who knows whether the report is accurate or actually includes all the major factors involved. But it is certainly a cautionary tale for others attempting to launch a high end attack on Apple’s iPad or even Android.

The fact is that Apple created its mobile operating system, iOS, with a very sound foundation, somewhat based on OS X, and it has been refining and polishing iOS for five years now, since its original announcement by Steve Jobs in January 2007.  At the time, Steve Jobs said “iPhone is a revolutionary and magical product that is literally five years ahead of any other mobile phone.” He was right.

Take a look at this part of the 2007 iPhone launch event and think about the mobile phones we all used back then and what we are using today. This announcement is probably Steve Jobs’ best-ever product launch. Here is the opening segment.

Finally

iTunes Match is a fairly powerful tool for backing up your iTunes music collection in the cloud. It also allows you to download higher bit rate (i.e., better sounding) audio files for songs you didn’t even buy originally from Apple.

But iTunes Match necessarily (given all its power) operates in ways that are not at all transparent, at least to the average user. It is in some ways more complicated for an end user to manage than typical Apple software.

Fortunately, Apple has finally released bevy of information on the hows and whys of iTunes Match. On this site you can find basic instructions, a video showing how it works and series of FAQs. If you use iTunes Match you should take a look. (via 9to5Mac)

When it rains, it pours

On Monday, Apple won a patent victory over HTC in which the court held that Android violated one Apple patent.

On Tuesday, Microsoft won a patent victory over Motorola Mobility in which the court held that Android violated one Microsoft patent.

Given the large number of claims already filed, there will be ongoing violations found.