There is trouble in paradise. Anna Marie Cox:
The marriage between the [Fox] network and the [Republican] party has been almost entirely beneficial to both entities. Working together – brazenly, even explicitly so – has been a force multiplier for the GOP brand and message. It’s not really a surprise that as the linked swimmers have started to go against the current of history, their connection puts them both at risk of drowning.
On the surface, the question appears to be: who will let go first? Jettisoning Morris and Palin suggests that Fox is loosening its grip and attempting to edge away from the Tea Party-based ideological rigor that weighed down the GOP in 2012. But almost simultaneously, Republicans have been speaking publicly about breaking away from their dependence on the network. As one strategist told Buzzfeed:
“Fox is great. But those viewers already agree with us … How else are different demographics going to get to know you if you never reach out to them?”
No matter who may be trying to end the marriage first, extricating themselves from the relationship won’t be graceful: the habits of mental cohabitation are too difficult to break. Witness the coverage of Benghazi, where conservative outrage on the channel remains strident and forceful and in harmony with Republican officials, despite the willingness of most of the country to move on to matters closer to home. It’s a positive feedback loop that spirals into irrelevance: Republicans pursue a conspiracy that only Fox viewers believe, based on reports only Fox airs, and new information gets hammered into a shape that fits the existing narrative.
Ben Stein, speaking on Fox News, calls for higher taxes on the very rich. You don’t often here this kind of truth on Fox and Friends.
Why did Gretchen Carlson leave the set? Apparently she had enough of the sexism of her mail co-host.
When simplistic tag lines are ordered up at Fox News by Rupert Murdoch, Roger Ailes and Prince Waleed, and they are parroted within hours by every politician and talking head on the right, perhaps ask “is this the conservatism of Barry Goldwater and William F. Buckley, any longer?” Ponder: what do these New Lords get out of teaching you to hate every American elite of science, intellect or skill, along with your own freely elected government… while demanding that you ignore the one elite that threatens everything we love? Theirs?
Or it is not the end of the world. You decide.
Mark Morford has his own thoughts on the issue that are well worth a read.
Reports are flooding in from around the world that the Fukushima meltdown was one of the worst disasters in mankind’s short history, a game-changing horror of unimaginable scope and psychological timbre that will wreak emotional and environmental havoc for years, decades and even millennia to come, spreading radioactive particles over thousands of square miles of Japan and beyond.
The Fukushima meltdown is easily as terrible as 1979’s Three Mile Island, which, it turns out, wasn’t all that bad, depending on who you don’t care enough to ask. Fukushima is probably the second worst disaster of its kind in history, even though no one really knows how to measure the full extent of these things so that’s probably false as well, although we do know it’s not as bad as Chernobyl because nothing could ever really be that devastating ever again, except for the fact that it totally could.
At least there’s one good thing to come out of this whole Juan Williams v. NPR mess: we’ve finally found a program that Republicans are willing to say they would cut.
– an unnamed reader of Andrew Sullivan’s blog.
- Republicans Push to Defund NPR in Wake of Williams’ Firing (blogs.abcnews.com)
- Juan Williams Says NPR Was ‘Looking For A Reason’ To Fire Him (mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com)
- The Ironic Firing of Juan Williams From NPR (dvorak.org)
- Cantor: Republican Leadership Will Consider Defunding NPR (huffingtonpost.com)
This probably won’t be on YouTube for long. (via Roger Ebert)
- When Donald Duck met Glenn Beck (boingboing.net)
- Right Wing Radio Duck (seminal.firedoglake.com)
- This Exists: Donald Duck Discovers Glenn Beck (VIDEO) (mediaite.com)
Come on now. She is a nice. How many of y’all have met her? She is a nice person. She’s a nice person. You know, let me give you a little lesson here. I hope you will listen to me. Just because somebody disagrees with you doesn’t mean that they’re not a good person. And I want to tell ya, I’ve been in the Senate for five years and I’ve taken a lot of that because I’ve been on the small side, both in the Republican Party and the Democrat Party. Just because I don’t agree with them, it doesn’t mean I’m bad. It means I have a legitimate point of view that’s different than theirs. And what we have to have is make sure we have a debate in this country so that you can see what’s going on and make the determination yourself. So, don’t catch yourself being biased by Fox News that somebody’s no good. The people in Washington are good. They just don’t know what they don’t know.
– Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK), defending House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and disparaging Fox News.