<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bits &#38; Pieces &#187; MPAA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freer.com/bits/tag/mpaa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freer.com/bits</link>
	<description>Your TSA: Dominate. Intimidate. Control.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 11:54:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bogus copyright violation numbers</title>
		<link>http://freer.com/bits/2012/03/16/bogus-copyright-violation-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://freer.com/bits/2012/03/16/bogus-copyright-violation-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freer.com/bits/?p=17623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://freer.com/bits/2012/03/16/bogus-copyright-violation-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SOPA soap opera</title>
		<link>http://freer.com/bits/2012/01/26/sopa-soap-opera/</link>
		<comments>http://freer.com/bits/2012/01/26/sopa-soap-opera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Dodd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freer.com/bits/?p=16794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a fascinating article in The Hollywood Reporter describing the behind-the-scenes drama at the MPAA during the SOPA smackdown of the past few weeks. In the desperate hours of early January, with chatter spreading that the White House was &#8230; <a href="http://freer.com/bits/2012/01/26/sopa-soap-opera/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://freer.com/bits/2012/01/26/sopa-soap-opera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is that a threat? (updated)</title>
		<link>http://freer.com/bits/2012/01/21/is-that-a-threat/</link>
		<comments>http://freer.com/bits/2012/01/21/is-that-a-threat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Dodd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motion Picture Association of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freer.com/bits/?p=16741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those who count on quote &#8220;Hollywood&#8221; for support need to understand that this industry is watching very carefully who&#8217;s going to stand up for them when their job is at stake. Don&#8217;t ask me to write a check for you &#8230; <a href="http://freer.com/bits/2012/01/21/is-that-a-threat/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://freer.com/bits/2012/01/21/is-that-a-threat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tim O&#8217;Reilly: Lobbying and SOPA</title>
		<link>http://freer.com/bits/2012/01/14/tim-oreilly-lobbying-and-sopa/</link>
		<comments>http://freer.com/bits/2012/01/14/tim-oreilly-lobbying-and-sopa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 13:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment to the United States Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Valenti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motion Picture Association of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freer.com/bits/?p=16580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tim O&#8217;Reilly, noted publisher of tech-related books, has a Google+ post noting the failure of Congress to make a careful technical and economic study of SOPA, rather than its current approach of &#8220;balancing&#8221; the positions of lobbyists. My point is &#8230; <a href="http://freer.com/bits/2012/01/14/tim-oreilly-lobbying-and-sopa/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://freer.com/bits/2012/01/14/tim-oreilly-lobbying-and-sopa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A secret treaty</title>
		<link>http://freer.com/bits/2010/02/08/a-secret-treaty/</link>
		<comments>http://freer.com/bits/2010/02/08/a-secret-treaty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freer.com/bits/?p=5869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the New York Times is reporting, there is currently an international effort underway to negotiate a new treaty primarily aimed at protecting intellectual property.  And it is being done in secret. Behind a veil of secrecy, the United States, &#8230; <a href="http://freer.com/bits/2010/02/08/a-secret-treaty/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://freer.com/bits/2010/02/08/a-secret-treaty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

