Bigot of the day

So your little son starts to act a little girlish when he is four years old and instead of squashing that like a cockroach and saying, “Man up, son, get that dress off you and get outside and dig a ditch, because that is what boys do,” you get out the camera and you start taking pictures of Johnny acting like a female and then you upload it to YouTube and everybody laughs about it and the next thing you know, this dude, this kid is acting out childhood fantasies that should have been squashed.

Can I make it any clearer? Dads, the second you see your son dropping the limp wrist, you walk over there and crack that wrist. Man up. Give him a good punch. Ok? You are not going to act like that. You were made by God to be a male and you are going to be a male. And when your daughter starts acting to Butch you reign her in. And you say, “Oh, no, sweetheart. You can play sports. Play them to the glory of God. But sometimes you are going to act like a girl and walk like a girl and talk like a girl and smell like a girl and that means you are going to be beautiful. You are going to be attractive. You are going to dress yourself up.”

You say, “Can I take charge like that as a parent?”

Yeah, you can. You are authorized. I just gave you a special dispensation this morning to do that.

– South Carolina pastor Sean Harris.  You can listen to the audio here.

Christionist homophobes testify

Omaha is considering the adoption of an anti-discrimination ordinance protecting gays and lesbians. Check out the wacko “christian” testimony against the proposal.

(via TowelRoad)

In God (conservatives) trust

Only the motto “E Pluribus Unum” (“from many, one”) survived the committee in which Adams, Jefferson, and Franklin had served. All had agreed on that motto from the beginning. The current motto, “In God We Trust,” was developed by a later generation. It was used on some coinage at the height of religious fervor during the upheaval of the Civil War. It was made the official national motto in 1956, at the height of the Cold War, to signal opposition to the feared secularizing ideology of communism.

In other words, “In God We Trust” is a legacy of founders, but not the founders of the nation. As the official national motto, it is a legacy of the founders of modern American conservatism—a legacy reaffirmed by the current Congress.

–  Thomas Foster, quoted by Andrew Sullivan.

What did Paterno know?

Joe Nocera, writing in today’s New York Times, notes that at the time the 2002 child sexual abuse incident in the Penn State locker room was reported to Joe Paterno, information about the widespread sexual abuse in the Catholic church, and the damage to the church from such activity, was widely known. Joe Paterno is a devout Catholic and was likely watching these developments with great interest.

By March 1, 2002 — the date, according to a grand jury report, that Jerry Sandusky, the former Paterno assistant, was spotted in the locker-room shower raping a boy believed to be about 10 years old — every Catholic was sadly familiar with the sex abuse scandal that had engulfed the Roman Catholic Church. They knew that predatory priests had taken advantage of their proximity and positions of trust to sexually abuse young boys, just as Sandusky appears to have done. They knew that church leaders had covered it up. And they knew the devastating consequences of the abuse.

Two months before Sandusky’s alleged rape, The Boston Globe had begun publishing its powerful series on clergy sexual abuse. Dioceses were being sued by lawyers for the victims, who, in turn, were coming forward to describe how the abuse they suffered as children had shattered their lives. Alcoholism, drug abuse, and depression were common themes.

Watching the damage to the Catholic church caused numerous cover-ups, why in the world didn’t Paterno act to protect his beloved Penn State by disclosure to the police at the time he first became aware of the problem?

Nocera also condemns the standard big-time college football practice of refusing to pay or insure “student-athletes” while making millions of dollars from football programs. He wonders whether that isn’t a form of abuse as well.

Religion quote of the day

L. Ron Hubbard

L. Ron Hubbard

Instead of printing the legend as fact, I recently interviewed the acclaimed science-fiction author Harlan Ellison, who told me he was at the birth of Scientology. At a meeting in New York City of a sci-fi writers’ group called the Hydra Club, Hubbard was complaining to L. Sprague de Camp and the others about writing for a penny a word. “Lester del Rey then said half-jokingly, ‘What you really ought to do is create a religion because it will be tax-free,’ and at that point everyone in the room started chiming in with ideas for this new religion. So the idea was a Gestalt that Ron caught on to and assimilated the details. He then wrote it up as ‘Dianetics: A New Science of the Mind’ and sold it to John W. Campbell, Jr., who published it in Astounding Science Fiction in 1950.

Michael Shermer, Scientific American, November 2011. (via Quotation of the Day Mailing List)

Technology as religion

Umberto Eco, way back in 1994, penned an essay in which he argued that DOS was equivilent to the Protestant religion, Apple’s OS was Catholic, and Windows was Anglican. The analogy was certainly apt at the time, and perhaps remains so today. Here is an excerpt quoted in The Telegraph:

The fact is that the world is divided between users of the Macintosh computer and users of MS-DOS compatible computers. I am firmly of the opinion that the Macintosh is Catholic and that DOS is Protestant. Indeed, the Macintosh is counterreformist and has been influenced by the “ratio studiorum” of the Jesuits. It is cheerful, friendly, conciliatory, it tells the faithful how they must proceed step by step to reach – if not the Kingdom of Heaven – the moment in which their document is printed. It is catechistic: the essence of revelation is dealt with via simple formulae and sumptuous icons. Everyone has a right to salvation.

DOS is Protestant, or even Calvinistic. It allows free interpretation of scripture, demands difficult personal decisions, imposes a subtle hermeneutics upon the user, and takes for granted the idea that not all can reach salvation. To make the system work you need to interpret the program yourself: a long way from the baroque community of revelers, the user is closed within the loneliness of his own inner torment.

You may object that, with the passage to Windows, the DOS universe has come to resemble more closely the counterreformist tolerance of the Macintosh. It’s true: Windows represents an Anglican-style schism, big ceremonies in the cathedral, but there is always the possibility of a return to DOS to change things in accordance with bizarre decisions…

 

Dominionism: term of the hour

Both Michelle Bachmann and Rick Perry, besides being contenders for the GOP presidential nomination, are believers in Dominionism. What it it? Bascially, it is a belief that Christians (and only Christians) should run institutions, governments, schools and businesses around the world.

Here is a brief summary from Michelle Goldberg:

Put simply, Dominionism means that Christians have a God-given right to rule all earthly institutions. Originating among some of America’s most radical theocrats, it’s long had an influence on religious-right education and political organizing. But because it seems so outré, getting ordinary people to take it seriously can be difficult. Most writers, myself included, who explore it have been called paranoid. In a contemptuous 2006 First Things review of several books, including Kevin Phillips’ American Theocracy, and my own Kingdom Coming: The Rise of Christian Nationalism, conservative columnist Ross Douthat wrote, “the fear of theocracy has become a defining panic of the Bush era.”

More in the full article.  Also, the topic is covered in this profile of Michele Bachmann from a recent issue of The New Yorker.

Governor Christie could win

When and if Chris Christie decides to run for President, his straight talk would serve him well. I don’t agree with all his positions, nonetheless he does have integrity and would be a formidable candidate.

For example: