PlayBook reviews

RIM, the manufacturer of BlackBerry phones, is releasing its PlayBook tablet computer soon and the reviews are starting to come in. Doesn’t sound like a significant threat to the Apple’s iPad to me. The PlayBook is a seven inch tablet (vs 10 inches for the iPad), and it won’t access your email, contacts or calendars unless you connect through a Blackberry. Also, there are very few third party apps.

David Pogue, The New York Times:

The PlayBook, then, is convenient, fast and coherently designed. But in its current half-baked form, it seems almost silly to try to assess it, let alone buy it.

Remember, the primary competition is an iPad — the same price, but much thinner, much bigger screen and a library of 300,000 apps. In that light, does it make sense to buy a fledgling tablet with no built-in e-mail or calendar, no cellular connection, no videochat, Skype, no Notes app, no GPS app, no videochat, no Pandora radio and no Angry Birds

Walt Mossberg, Wall Street Journal:

This first edition of the PlayBook has no built-in cellular data connection and lacks such basic built-in apps as an email program, a contacts program, a calendar, a memo pad and even RIM’s popular BlackBerry Messenger chat system.

To get these features with your $500 PlayBook, you must use it with a nearby BlackBerry phone connected to it wirelessly over a short-range Bluetooth connection. Once this link is made, these critical applications pop up on the PlayBook’s screen, via a system called Bridge.

But these are essentially ghosts of the same apps on the phone. In my tests, I could use them from the tablet, where they looked nicer, and they did synchronize with the phone. But when I broke the connection, the apps became grayed-out and the data they held disappeared. It is all stored on the phone.

This odd system, aimed at pleasing security-concerned corporate customers, doesn’t work with other smartphones. So, in my view, even though Bridge is a neat technical feat, it makes the PlayBook a companion to a BlackBerry phone rather than a fully independent device.

MG Siegler, TechCrunch:

Is the PlayBook comparable to the iPad? No. Between the (lack of) app support and the wonky web browsing, there’s just no way around that fact. But RIM was smart to make the PlayBook a completely different form factor and give it BlackBerry Bridge to appeal to corporate users. So in that regard, there could be significant interest in this device.

But given that it’s selling at the same price points as the iPad, I find it hard to imagine they’ll be able to compete in the consumer space right now. Maybe if they can nail the Android app support that will change the scene a bit. But Google and their partners are undoubtedly hard at work to make sure something like that doesn’t happen as well — can you imagine the humiliation if a non-Android tablet outsells the Android devices thanks to it being able to run Android apps?

Predicting the future

It is often difficult to predict the future of technology. It is so difficult that most technology predictions end up looking silly. For example, I am still waiting for the arrival of widespread flying cars that we were supposed to have some time ago.

But here are some pretty good ones that were included in AT&T TV ads from 1993. (Note: These are narrated by Tom Selleck and directed by David Fincher, the director of The Social Network.) (via Mashable)

Time to upgrade

After reading this review, I can’t wait to go out and buy the new device.

“The new device is an improvement over the old device, making it more attractive for purchase by all Americans,” said Thomas Wakefield, a spokesperson for the large conglomerate that manufactures the new device. “The old device is no longer sufficient. Consumers should no longer have any use or longing for the old device.”

Added Wakefield, “The new device will retail for $395.”

Able to remain operational for longer periods of time and occupy a demonstrably smaller three-dimensional space, the new device is so advanced when compared to the old device that it makes the old device appear much older than it actually is. However, the new device is reportedly not so radically different as to cause confusion or unwanted anxiety among those familiar with the feel of the old device.

“Its higher price indicates to me that it is superior, and that not everyone will be able to afford it, which only makes me want to possess it more,” said Tim Sturges, owner of the old device, which he obtained 18 months ago when it was still the new device. “I feel a strong urge to purchase the new device. Owning the new device will please me and improve my daily life.”

First Windows Phone 7 ad

This is actually quite good.

I think that Windows Phone 7 (or whatever the hell they call it) could be very successful. If Microsoft had been able to come out with this phone two years ago, then between Android, the iPhone and Windows Phone 7, eventually the top two would have been iPhone and Windows Phone 7. Why? Because Android appeals (and has been marketed to) geeks. Check out this Droid ad (or this one) and tell me who it connected with. Geeks and gadget freaks, God love them, are not the ordinary people who buy the overwhelming majority of phones. That and the fact that Microsoft will spend millions of dollars on advertising. However, Microsoft waited too long to capture what their phones seem capable of.

And here is another good Microsoft ad.

How (not) to hold a mobile phone (update)

While the other cellphone manufacturers have had a field day claiming that the new iPhone is defective because their phones don’t have “dead spots” where the signal weakens if held, it is becoming apparent that Apple is correct: all mobile phones are subject to this phenomenon.

A sampling:

Nokia 6230i user guide (more at Edible Apple):

Or how about the HTC Droid Eris, one of the hot new Android phones? (via Daring Fireball)

How about the Palm Pre?

Anyone locate any other samples to share?

Updated: Now David Chartier has started a Tublr page to collect all the instructions on how not to hold cellphones, called Don’t Hold It Wrong. My question is when will Consumer Reports update all their cellphone reviews to include such information, as well as demand fixes from all the manufacturers?

iPhone 4 v. HTC EVO (Updated x2)

(Contains crude language)

For a rebuttal, see here.

Update: Now it seems that Best Buy is trying to fire the guy who created these terrific videos. I have always hated Best Buy anyway, because most of their help is no help at all and their prices are often too high.

Update 2: And Paramount is desperately trying to reach him. His future is assured.

Disintermediation (updated)

Disintermediation is the process by which a process middleman in a process is eliminated. Remember what the Internet did to travel agents? Who uses a travel agent these days? And how about bricks-and-mortor book stores?

Well, we are (finally) getting closer to disintermediation of the cable TV companies. The Internet is a terrific platform for delivering content directly to end users. As users buy increasing numbers IP-enabled gadgets for use in their homes, cars and everywhere else for that matter, the days of cable companies providing programming via a wire are likely numbered. Connect your TV to a computer, pick up your iPad, fire up your cellphone, and you already can access a ton of entertainment available on demand and without traditional broadcast or cable TV signals. No tuner required, just a web browser or entertainment app.

Wired’s Epicenter notes a milestone in the process of Cable TV obsolescence. Hulu, already an extremely popular Internet TV (IPTV) service, appears close to piloting a new service that would provide a huge collection of TV programs for $10/month. This would include CBS, Viacom, Time Warner’s television studio divisions, Fox, NBC Universal, ABC, ABC Family, Biography, Lionsgate, Endemol, MGM, MTV Networks, National Geographic, Digital Rights Group, Paramount, PBS, Sony Pictures Television, Warner Bros. and more, including Wired.com.

For ten bucks, one wouldn’t expect the level of programming cable and satellite offer for larger monthly bills. But if paid Hulu works, the networks will have proof that the internet can circumvent cable and satellite companies and they could easily add more expensive content tiers down the road.

If the networks prove they can charge consumers directly, and consumers are happy to supply their own “cable boxes” in the form of game consoles, television-connected computers, set-top boxes, tablets and so on, it’s difficult to see why networks would tolerate cable and satellite providers grabbing a slice of profits, just for sending the shows through one pipe rather than the other.

Cable and satellite are classic middlemen. When the internet meets the middleman, the middleman tends to disappear — or at least be replaced by a thinner middleman. We’ve seen it with record stores, classified ad-dependent newspapers, video-rental stores, bookstores and any other business that delivers something that the internet can deliver more efficiently.

The “thinner middleman” as far as IPTV is concerned could be ISPs, which already charge more for faster data plans capable of delivering better-looking video. But as multipurpose providers, they’ll never command as large a slice of the pie as cable/satellite companies did with their television-only pipes.

Think about it. Wouldn’t you love to replace your current cable television provider with a $10 monthly fee? And wouldn’t you love to access the programing on your computer-connected TVs, your iPad, your computers, your cellphone, etc.? And, via IPTV, you can also access hundreds of alternative programming sources, like this, that no cable provider carries at all. The fabled universal jukebox that would let you call up any media on demand is closer every day.

Or do you want to be wired to your cable provider and its monthly bills?

Update 6/29/10: Hulu Plus is now here. Or at least it is here enough that you can ask for invitation to try the preview.  The iPhone and iPad apps are now available in the iTunes app store. Looks great to me.

Apple, please

Today was a total fail for Apple and it appears it was caused mainly by AT&T.

Pre-orders for the new iPhone 4 opened early this morning. However, the opening was the only thing that happened smoothly. And by smoothly, I mean you could begin the process of pre-ordering a new iPhone, but most users could never finish the process even as of now, early evening in the Midwest.

It is past time for Apple to expand its squadron of authorized iPhone service providers in the United States. AT&T has had problems with every rollout of the iPhone and by now, they really should be up to the task. When coupled with dropped calls and other AT&T network glitches for the past three years, not to mention AT&T’s last minute alteration of data plans in the midst of the iPad rollout, change must come to Cupertino.

NYT on the Singularity (updated)

The New York Times has published a story outlining the current state of the Singularity and thinking about the Singularity. Worth a read.

Oh, here, from the article, is a short-hand description of the Singularity in case you are unfamiliar with the term in this context.

[The Singularity is] a time, possibly just a couple decades from now, when a superior intelligence will dominate and life will take on an altered form that we can’t predict or comprehend in our current, limited state.

At that point, the Singularity holds, human beings and machines will so effortlessly and elegantly merge that poor health, the ravages of old age and even death itself will all be things of the past.

Some of Silicon Valley’s smartest and wealthiest people have embraced the Singularity. They believe that technology may be the only way to solve the world’s ills, while also allowing people to seize control of the evolutionary process. For those who haven’t noticed, the Valley’s most-celebrated company — Google — works daily on building a giant brain that harnesses the thinking power of humans in order to surpass the thinking power of humans.

Update: If you read the article, you might also enjoy this reaction by Anne Laurie over on Balloon Juice.

Zuckerberg on privacy

I have advocated for some time that folks should drop their Facebook accounts based on a history on the part of Facebook of betraying the privacy expectations of their users.  Watch the sweaty, squirming Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg try to justify the anti-privacy actions of his company.  He twists and turns and gives no real answers or promised, despite repeated prompting.

Having seen the video, can you trust this guy?

Apple: the week just ended

The Macalope analyzes the comings and goings of Apple (and its increasingly angry critics) over the past week. (via Daring Fireball)

Excerpt:

Joe Wilcox points to seven techno-elites who have returned or are threatening to return their iPads for a variety of reasons, many of which make perfect sense. The Macalope certainly understands why you might be soured on the device if you had the Wi-Fi problems some are experiencing it (the Macalope doesn’t doubt there are problems, but he has had exactly zero issues with his).

“I didn’t need it,” on the other hand, seems a little weak. You couldn’t figure that out before you bought it?