PSA: Wear your seatbelt
March 6, 2010
by Brant
0 comments
January 18, 2010
by Brant
1 comment
You remember Flight 1529, the flight that was forced down in the Hudson? Well, of course all the people were saved. But what about the aircraft itself that held together despite landing in the water? It too was ultimately saved from an icy death.
Exclusive unseen video footage of the Miracle on the Hudson, flight 1549 New York City from David Martin on Vimeo.
December 28, 2009
by Brant
Comments Off
It seems to me that the complaints about the failure to stop the most recent terrorist attempt on Christmas are valid. Valid in the sense that a sufficient warning had been provided to the US government to trigger at least a careful search of the terrorist prior to allowing him to board a plane.
On the other hand, I think that there is no way to stop all would-be terrorist, aside from requiring passengers to travel nude following full-body cat scans. Anytime you bring people together in a closed space there is a risk of criminal behavior. Nate Silver has provided a calculation of the true risk of being a victim of airborne terror:
Over the past decade, according to BTS, there have been 99,320,309 commercial airline departures that either originated or landed within the United States. Dividing by six, we get one terrorist incident per 16,553,385 departures.
These departures flew a collective 69,415,786,000 miles. That means there has been one terrorist incident per 11,569,297,667 mles flown. This distance is equivalent to 1,459,664 trips around the diameter of the Earth, 24,218 round trips to the Moon, or two round trips to Neptune.
Assuming an average airborne speed of 425 miles per hour, these airplanes were aloft for a total of 163,331,261 hours. Therefore, there has been one terrorist incident per 27,221,877 hours airborne. This can also be expressed as one incident per 1,134,245 days airborne, or one incident per 3,105 years airborne.
Am I wrong to ask how many more billions of dollars we are willing to spend to reduce this extremely small risk? Are we getting our money’s worth from the huge amounts spent on the TSA? Certainly there are a great number of risks that are far larger than this that could use the funding for risk mitigation.
Update: And today, Holman Jenkins, Jr., writes an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal noting that airport security is actually very good.
Silly are the outrage and accusations simply because Mr. Abdulmutallab was on a list (along with 550,000 others about whom suspicions have been raised) without keeping him off a flight. Critics really seem to be saying that, politically, security personnel can’t maintain any lists that are bigger or different from the no-fly list—which is ridiculous.
Let’s be realistic—efficient counterterrorism requires the setting of priorities. There has to be more than one list. Yet the reaction to Farouk Abdulmutallab may soon mean there will be one list and eventually everybody will be on it and nobody will be able to fly.
August 24, 2009
by Brant
Comments Off
This video speaks for itself.
World’s Worst Bus Driver – Watch more Funny Videos
July 27, 2009
by Brant
Comments Off
In the first study of its kind, truckers texting while driving were shown to increase their risk of collision 23 times. We need regulation of distractions of drivers within vehicles. Outright bans of this kind of behavior are needed. Now.
April 16, 2009
by Brant
Comments Off
April 13, 2009
by Brant
Comments Off
Southern California is the land of car chases. There have even been jokes that there should be a basic cable channel that shows nothing but live car chases 24×7. However, here is one of the wildest ones I have ever seen. Don’t try this at home.
April 7, 2009
by Brant
Comments Off

This is not a joke. Apparently GM and Segway are going to build the PUMA pictured above. More here at Autoblog.
April 1, 2009
by Brant
Comments Off
Mark Morford dubs the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro the “last muscle car.” Further, he says good riddance to all muscle cars.
Have you seen this thing? This sexy macho bloated Hot Wheels fantasia dreamgasm of a car-like drunken child’s funbot crayon sketch?
Well, they did. And it’s here. And they don’t. And it’s David Lee Roth (of course). And it’s worth noting because, well, this wild new Camaro will very likely be the last you will ever hear of U.S. automakers vying to be a kickass, world-dominating force in automotive inspiration. It is most certainly the last gasp of that overblown, yet much-beloved myth, affectionately known as the American muscle car.
No? Because it appears to be a vehicle that at least some across the Big Autosphere are still secretly praying, despite the sudden overthrow of — despite the deadly ultimatum for — General Motors, might yet prove to be a savior.
Indeed, it’s a car some hope will maybe, just maybe sell like crazy and restore a tiny bit of faith in big, thick, meaty, rather inane American cars that have no real place in the new millennium, but which for some reason they keep building anyway, presumably because aging frat boys you should never, ever date think they’re totally wickedcool and will therefore be willing to shell out 35 grand to own, unless they won’t.
Am I talking about the ugly-as-a-giant-vacuum-cleaner Chevy Volt? Am I aiming this admittedly overheated verbiage at the ruddy, useless Impala? No, I am not.
I am talking about the brand new, leering, pseudo-masculine 2010 Chevrolet Camaro.
What’s that you say? You had no idea that Chevy was resurrecting this rolling mullet from the mausoleum of the ’70s because, even after sucking up billions in bailout money, GM still doesn’t really have a single fresh and forward-thinking idea, and hence the best they can do is scrape the barrel of macho nostalgia in a desperate attempt to cater to male Boomers who drink too much light beer and think Maxim is the height of masculinity and are still debating which Van Halen vocalist totally ruled?
March 31, 2009
by Brant
Comments Off
While I have some concerns about the Obama administration plans for GM and Chrysler, it appears that the Republicans, usually the party with the most disciplined message, don’t quite know what to make of it.
President Barack Obama may or may not be able to save the U.S. auto industry, but his dramatic restricting plan is already having some effect: It’s sent the highly disciplined GOP message machine careening out of control.
Sen. John McCain, the Republicans’ 2008 presidential candidate, accused Obama Monday of “unprecedented window dressing” and said his plan didn’t go far enough. But Rep. Thaddeus G. McCotter, chairman of the House Republican Policy Committee, complained that Obama was being tougher on Detroit than he’s been on Wall Street.
California Rep. Darrell Issa praised Obama for having “struck the right chord.” But Tennessee Sen. Lamar Alexander said Obama’s plan was “not the right direction.”
February 10, 2009
by Brant
Comments Off
GM is planning to cut 10,000 jobs this year, or 14% of its salaried workforce. The remaining salaried workers will suffer a 3% to 10% paycut. Very bad news for Michigan.
January 16, 2009
by Brant
Comments Off
No need to wait for your local road commission to paint bike lanes in your area. You can simply bring your own.